周啟邦律師事務所俾法庭鬧 K B Chau & Co Solicitors Criticized By Court [2018] HKCA 210!
62. After the conclusion of the hearing, and without seeking leave of the court or the consent of the plaintiffs, William’s solicitors made further submissions by letter with proposals of directions from this court to the judge. This is highly unsatisfactory and such practice has been rightly deprecated in a number of decisions, including To Pui Kui v Ng Kwok Piu & Ors, CACV 281/2012, 21 August 2014, at §§55 to 61. Mr Chua did not seek an adjournment of the hearing to deal with any further point he might wish to address, nor did he give any indication at the hearing he needed to do further research to supplement his submissions. There are no exceptional circumstances here to justify a round of further submissions after the hearing was concluded.
Mr Chua Guan-Hock SC and Mr Kerby Lau, instructed by K B Chau & Co, for the Defendant (Respondent) AU WING LUN (區穎麟) also known as AU WING LUN WILLIAM (區穎麟)
/2019/05/k-b-chau-co-solicitors-criticized-by-the-hong-kong-court-of-appeal.html?m=1
Solicitor Joseph Tang Convicted of Misconduct for Delay in Paying Counsel 鄧明輝事務律師遲找大律師費用被吊銷執業資格十二個月! 點解會有事務律師遲找大律師嘅費用咁低能？釘牌嗰喎！
/content/tang-ming-fai-joseph-respondent
DVC Barrister Simon Westbrook SC Rude and Distasteful and Displaying Poor Advocacy - Said Court of Appeal in CACC19/2010
/2014/01/lawyer-barrister-simon-westbrook-sc-senior-counsel-dvc-des-voeux-chambers.html?m=1
DVC Barrister Simon Westbrook SC Rude and Distasteful and Displaying Poor Advocacy - Said Court of Appeal in CACC19/2010
/2014/01/lawyer-barrister-simon-westbrook-sc-senior-counsel-dvc-des-voeux-chambers.html?m=1
Barrister Hylas Chung Unprofessional, Harmed Others And Did Not Benefit Self, Utterly Should Never Be Encouraged Or Imitated (Said Judge Poon)
鍾元富大律師對刑事審訊接納證據的基本法則一知半解胡亂指控聆訊時代表上訴人的大律師不稱職不切實際地提昇上訴人對成功上訴的期望做法不專業損人不利己 (法官潘敏琦說)
香港特別行政區 訴 袁郁鈞 [2007] 1 HKLRD 819
/2023/06/17/alexandra-chambers-barrister-hylas-chung-unprofessional-harmed-others-and-did-not-benefit-self-utterly-should-never-be-encouraged-or-imitated-said-judge-poon/
Barrister George Chu Misconduct Convicted! 朱奉慈大律師專業失當罪成 South China Morning Post, 12 Feb 2000 (Cliff Buddle) /article/307891/barrister-barred-deceiving-university Lawyer Counsel Barrister George Chu Barred for Deceiving University
Lawyer Counsel Barrister George Chu (朱奉慈大律師) has been suspended for six months after a disciplinary tribunal found he pretended to have a first class honours degree when applying for a scholarship at the University of Hong Kong.
George Chu Fung-chee, admitted to the Bar in 1994, also breached a promise to the university not to operate as a barrister once he became a post-graduate student, the Barristers’ Disciplinary Tribunal found.
The suspension was the longest to be imposed since 1996, and the tribunal took the unusual step of ordering that its findings be sent to the Secretary for Justice, Director of Legal Aid, the Law Society and all barristers.
Bar Association chairman Ronny Tong Ka-wah SC, said it had recently started requesting the tribunal to order publication of this kind in appropriate cases.
‘There is an educational element in the decisions themselves,’ he said.
![周啟邦律師事務所俾法庭鬧 K B Chau & Co Solicitors Criticized By Court [2018] HKCA 210!62. After the conclusion of the hearing, and without seeking leave of the court or the consent of the plaintiffs, William’s solicitors made further submissions by letter with proposals of directions from this court to the judge. This is highly unsatisfactory and such practice has been rightly deprecated in a number of decisions, including To Pui Kui v Ng Kwok Piu & Ors, CACV 281/2012, 21 August 2014, at §§55 to 61. Mr Chua did not seek an adjournment of the hearing to deal with any further point he might wish to address, nor did he give any indication at the hearing he needed to do further research to supplement his submissions. There are no exceptional circumstances here to justify a round of further submissions after the hearing was concluded.Mr Chua Guan-Hock SC and Mr Kerby Lau, instructed by K B Chau & Co, for the Defendant (Respondent) AU WING LUN (區穎麟) also known as AU WING LUN WILLIAM (區穎麟)/2019/05/k-b-chau-co-solicitors-criticized-by-the-hong-kong-court-of-appeal.html?m=1](https://sp1.pixwox.com/p/pt_6865595850264337503533_0_2eba9ed72e0c174fe50ca006864d6ed5.jpg?v/t51.29350-15/438729012_1115759956236377_8300300053676813684_n.jpg?stp=c0.280.720.720a_dst-jpg_e15_s640x640&_nc_ht=scontent-nrt1-2.cdninstagram.com&_nc_cat=105&_nc_ohc=QOVtDo7sEesQ7kNvgGKdWPC&edm=AOQ1c0wBAAAA&ccb=7-5&oh=00_AYDiXGUh-AYXbwNMMxw4ptQgpFQCRuSvgHMTBi_i1jIiyA&oe=668B3B3F&_nc_sid=8b3546)
![DVC Barrister Sakinah Sat Misled the Court Says Judge Linda Chan 陳靜芬法官說徳輔大律師事務所薩忻琪大律師誤導法庭 [2020] HKCFI 2288 (§13) https://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/ju/ju_frame.jsp?DIS=130716&currpage=T](https://sp1.pixwox.com/p/pt_6865441362164337264135_0_531168d8f94c91e56cf119af1eb175c2.jpg?v/t51.29350-15/438729007_1139686717174030_2040062039299312093_n.jpg?stp=c0.280.720.720a_dst-jpg_e15_s640x640&_nc_ht=scontent-nrt1-2.cdninstagram.com&_nc_cat=110&_nc_ohc=ChkutnyAH78Q7kNvgGc1PiS&edm=AOQ1c0wBAAAA&ccb=7-5&oh=00_AYD-b5vRPaopCwZnoY0HRuHfo5CsL0k3901-OxUkMDH_Gg&oe=668B3B65&_nc_sid=8b3546)
![Barrister Tara Liao Shallow 廖敏皓大律師流於表面 FTLife Insurance v Luk Kin [2024] HKCFI 91 (§97) 廖大律師於聆訊中作出的陳詞，流於表面，沒有嘗試找出問題的癥結所在，以致連對自己一方有利的案例也沒有援引（例如Shek）( 徐韻華 ) 高等法院原訟法庭暫委法官 呈請人：由肯尼狄律師行轉聘廖敏皓大律師代表 https://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/ju/ju_frame.jsp?DIS=157286&currpage=T](https://sp1.pixwox.com/p/pt_6865234719516617635415_0_cb5764487c6fd5233e8b146a6d62f6d2.jpg?v/t51.29350-15/439199720_941848134157655_5799541645074851685_n.jpg?stp=c0.280.720.720a_dst-jpg_e15_s640x640&_nc_ht=scontent-nrt1-2.cdninstagram.com&_nc_cat=111&_nc_ohc=hKccxvgl1dIQ7kNvgEdxDw7&edm=AOQ1c0wBAAAA&ccb=7-5&oh=00_AYAySu3RWaK9U1ooa50RpfsRK0JV_T4JU8FlqUu8wJuzcQ&oe=668B59F4&_nc_sid=8b3546)
![Barrister Candy Fong Convicted Criminal方也方大律師已被定罪罪犯 https://orientaldaily.on.cc/cnt/news/20200514/mobile/odn-20200514-0514_00176_049.htmlHKSAR v. FONG E-FONG CANDY - HCMA 108/2020 - [2020] HKCFI 3133/2020/12/convicted-criminal-barrister-candy-fong-lost-her-appeal-as-she-should.html?m=1](https://sp1.pixwox.com/p/pt_6811652430575955705611_0_1d3afdd3d47ce58ba6b9d0240ca754c5.jpg?v/t51.29350-15/449612192_879444720683148_9115452041586524870_n.jpg?stp=c0.280.720.720a_dst-jpg_e15_s640x640&_nc_ht=scontent-nrt1-2.cdninstagram.com&_nc_cat=100&_nc_ohc=M7Q6_lF3AjYQ7kNvgEX7JiG&edm=AOQ1c0wBAAAA&ccb=7-5&oh=00_AYCMo1JMMFXl6krrCtUddnzB1kJ69ZBk8Yu6-JNkwBfXQA&oe=668B601B&_nc_sid=8b3546)
![Barrister Hylas Chung Unprofessional, Harmed Others And Did Not Benefit Self, Utterly Should Never Be Encouraged Or Imitated (Said Judge Poon)鍾元富大律師對刑事審訊接納證據的基本法則一知半解胡亂指控聆訊時代表上訴人的大律師不稱職不切實際地提昇上訴人對成功上訴的期望做法不專業損人不利己 (法官潘敏琦說)香港特別行政區 訴 袁郁鈞 [2007] 1 HKLRD 819/2023/06/17/alexandra-chambers-barrister-hylas-chung-unprofessional-harmed-others-and-did-not-benefit-self-utterly-should-never-be-encouraged-or-imitated-said-judge-poon/](https://sp1.pixwox.com/p/pt_6811123758224437215642_0_b57274ab347cccb8a4f4636b84369363.jpg?v/t51.29350-15/449356926_462689726714890_8389857734058904073_n.jpg?stp=c0.280.720.720a_dst-jpg_e15_s640x640&_nc_ht=scontent-nrt1-2.cdninstagram.com&_nc_cat=110&_nc_ohc=E9cSitAsPmkQ7kNvgEcwGqF&edm=AOQ1c0wBAAAA&ccb=7-5&oh=00_AYCT_okqQ_tmM0_7Kdi5ek0gEeop4o9bS7A5jC8E4U-qHg&oe=668B4473&_nc_sid=8b3546)
